In Peerless Industries, Inc. v. Crimson AV, LLC, (2013 WL 85378 (N.D.Ill.), an Illinois District court heard, and rejected, common defense excuses to evade a deposition and electronic data discovery obligations. Plaintiff brought a patent infringement lawsuit against defendant Crimson, which company is closely aligned with a non-defendant Chinese corporation, Sycamore. In a prior ruling in
Motions to Compel
- admin
- January 30, 2013
Social Media Disclosure in Plaintiff ESI Production Requires Threshold Showing by Defendant
One new area of plaintiff electronic discovery that is often contentious is the request for access to personal social media accounts. Defendants are now commonly requesting total access to plaintiffs’ Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other accounts as part of eDiscovery. Many plaintiffs understandably object to this, typically alleging the requests are overbroad, an invasion of
Read More
- admin
- October 15, 2012
Another Day, Another Example of Spoliation in ESI Defense Productions
As this blog has noted before, instances of electronic data spoliation are becoming ever increasing events in high-stakes class action lawsuits, multi-district litigation and business litigation. While the motives may vary, in many situations, the missing evidence to be construed against them may be more damaging than the existing evidence itself. The business litigation case of Multifeeder Technology,
Read More
- admin
- September 19, 2012
Is eDiscovery Cost Shifting Appropriate Prior to Class Action Certification?
Recently in Boeynaems v. LA Fitness, No. 10-2326 (E.D.P.A. August 16, 2012), the federal district court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania addressed an issue apparently one of first impression – whether cost-shifting to plaintiffs related to pre-class certification discovery, including ESI discovery, was appropriate. Plaintiffs alleged the defendant national fitness chain was engaged in deception and breach of
Read More