ElectronicFiles

ilsteam
April 10, 2017

Court Confirms Arbitration Award Despite Plaintiff’s Claims of Database Tampering

White v. Four Seasons Hotel and Resorts, Case No. 13-1399 (District of Columbia, Mar. 23, 2017) is a race discrimination and sex discrimination case. Plaintiff, a black woman who was pregnant at the time of the charge, was an esthetician employed by Defendant on a part time basis who then moved into full time status

admin
February 15, 2017

Adverse Inference Instruction, Motion Fees and Costs Ordered Against Police Department For ESI Spoliation

Martinez v. Salazar et. al., Case No. 14-534 (D. N.M., Jan. 26, 2017) is an excessive force case filed by Plaintiff, the personal representative of Russell Martinez, against two police officers as well as the Espanola Police Department and the City of Espanosa. The Complaint alleged that one of the Defendant officers, Officer Salazar, responded

admin
December 23, 2016

CTA Ordered to Produce Spreadsheet of Confidential FLMA Forms to Plaintiff Bus Driver

In Buchanan v. Chicago Transit Authority, Case No. 16-4577 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 7, 2016), Plaintiff sued Defendant, his employer, under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Plaintiff was a Chicago city bus driver who had been injured in a car accident, causing him to request intermittent FMLA leave from his employer, Defendant, which required

admin
December 14, 2016

Defendant Must Produce Manipulated Version of Data Already Produced

In Connectus LLC v. Ampush Media, Inc. et. al., Case No. 15-2778 (M.D. Fla., Nov. 30, 2016), Plaintiff sued Defendants for stealing proprietary data worth millions of dollars and selling it to third parties. Plaintiff operates a website that connects prospective college students with different schools, either directly through the school or through an intermediary

admin
October 7, 2015

Utah Supreme Court Affirms Trial Judge’s Decision to Exclude Electronic Exhibits

In the divorce matter Dahl v. Dahl, 2015 UT 79, Case Nos. 20100683, 20111077 (Ut., Aug. 27, 2015), the Utah Supreme Court considered a trial judge’s decision to exclude most of one party’s exhibits because the party had failed to properly identify the electronic files it planned to use as exhibits during trial. At the pretrial conference,