In an order dated May 21, 2013 in the case Hinterberger v. Catholic Health Systems, 08-CV-380S(F), the court heard arguments from the parties about whether predictive coding case law requires the early production of a “seed set” of documents. In this case, the parties started out sorting and culling electronic data by keyword search, but
predictive coding Archives - ILS
- admin
- April 24, 2013
Will Email Threads Uncover Fraud in an $18 Billion International Case?
As email threads are now critical evidence in most civil litigation, it should be no surprise that email might be the key to determining whether massive fraud is at play in a very interesting case out of the Southern District of New York. Chevron Corp. v. Steven Donzinger, et al., No. 11 Civ. 0691 (LAK)(S.D.N.Y.
Read More
- admin
- April 22, 2013
District Court Chastises Defendant for Lack of eDiscovery Knowledge
Many lawyers now have a good understanding of electronic discovery law and technological advances, and the updated ABA model rules require this understanding to fulfill the ethical requirement of competence. For attorneys who lack this knowledge or who attempt to claim ignorance to evade discovery obligations should take note: courts will likely not stand for
Read More
- admin
- December 26, 2012
Counting Down the Top Plaintiff eDiscovery Cases of 2012
It has been an interesting year for plaintiff eDiscovery experts who monitor new developments in electronic discovery law throughout the country. While some of these cases are good for plaintiffs and others less so, in each situation, additional legal issues arise as modern eDiscovery jurisprudence continues to evolve. Top 2012 eDiscovery Cases for Plaintiff Trial
Read More
- admin
- December 21, 2012
Reviewing the Top 5 Plaintiff eDiscovery Cases of 2012
Our blog discusses the latest cases (good and bad) that affect plaintiff trial attorneys every week, and the following is our Top 5 Plaintiff eDiscovery cases of 2012: 5. Race Tires America, Inc. LLC v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp. (Race Tires II), No. 11-2316, 2012 WL 887593 (3d Cir. Mar. 16, 2012). The Third Circuit
Read More
- admin
- November 7, 2012
Section 1782’s Ever-Expanding Discovery for Foreign Litigation and ADR
Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1782 is a federal law allowing a person or entity who is involved in foreign litigation to apply to the American court system for discovery against U.S. citizens or corporations to be used in the foreign litigation. The discovery could include electronic data, documents or testamentary evidence. The language of the
Read More
- admin
- August 10, 2012
Did the Global Aerospace Order Ease the Fears of Plaintiffs?
The plaintiffs’ objections to the defendant’s use of predictive coding to cull their enormous ESI production was noted to be “not fully articulated” in the 2012 Virginia case Global Aerospace, Inc., et al. v. Landow Aviation, L.P. d/b/a Dulles Jet Center, et al., (Case No. CL 61040). Our last blog noted that this might have
Read More
- admin
- August 8, 2012
Plaintiff ESI Production Strategies are Necessary from the Beginning of the Case
The 2012 Virginia court opinion Global Aerospace, Inc., et al. v. Landow Aviation, L.P. d/b/a Dulles Jet Center, et al., (Case No. CL 61040) was no small discovery case. The physical amount of the ESI data was over 200 gigabytes (GB), or the equivalent of about two million pages if printed. The court in Global
Read More