MotionForSanctions

admin
February 10, 2017

Foreign Companies Investigated by Foreign Government under No Duty to Preserve ESI for Potential U.S. Lawsuits, Court Says

In Rockman Company (USA), Inc. et. al. v. Nong Shim Company, LTD, et. al., Case No. 13-04115 (N.D. Cali., Jan. 19, 2017), Plaintiffs, direct and indirect purchasers of Korean noodles, filed suit against four companies and their U.S. distributors, accusing them of conspiracy to fix the price of Korean noodles in the United States. During the

admin
January 11, 2017

DC Court Admonishes Party for Flouting Discovery Deadline and Orders Attorney’s Fees Sanction

In 3E Mobile, LLC v. Global Cellular, Inc., Case NO. 14-1975 (District of Columbia, Dec. 22, 2016), Plaintiff, a manufacturer of cell phone cases, sued Defendant, a provider of cell phone accessories, several years ago over an intellectual property dispute. The case was settled in 2013, and Defendant promised to make payments in return for

ilsteam
November 23, 2015

Court Denies Pro Se Plaintiff’s Motion for Spoliation Sanctions

In Garner v. Executive Management Services, Inc., et. al., Case No. 13-2043 (S.D. Ind., Nov. 6, 2015), pro se Plaintiff filed a Motion for Sanctions against the attorney for the Defendants, alleging that he 1) lost or destroyed an original of a manual produced by Plaintiff; 2) failed to preserve evidence, although Plaintiff did not identify